Talk with Arthur Danto

Arthur Coleman Danto (1924–2013) was an influential American art critic, philosopher, and professor at Columbia University. He is best known for his work in philosophical aesthetics and philosophy of history, though his interests and writings spanned many other areas, including art criticism, the philosophy of action, and historiography.

One of Danto's most significant contributions to philosophy is his "institutional theory of art," which he developed in the essay "The Artworld" (1964). In this theory, Danto argues that what makes something a work of art is not its visible properties but the context or "artworld" – an institutional framework consisting of artists, critics, curators, and others who play a role in determining the status of a work as art. This theory arose partly in response to the challenges posed by the avant-garde and movements like Pop Art, which blurred the traditional boundaries between art and everyday objects.

Another notable contribution by Danto involves his philosophical exploration of the "end of art" thesis. In his book "After the End of Art" (1997), Danto argues that art history has reached an endpoint in our post-historical era, where no particular style or narrative drives art practice, allowing for a plurality of styles and practices. Here he discusses how the historical narrative of art has concluded with the liberalization of art where everything can now be considered art.

Danto's work has had a profound impact on contemporary philosophy of art, influencing how art is viewed and critiqued in philosophical and art circles. His writings continue to spark debate and inspire analysis on the nature and purpose of art.

Arthur Danto, a philosopher and art critic, approached conceptual art with a nuanced perspective. While appreciating its challenge to traditional aesthetics and its expansion of what could be considered art, Danto also expressed certain critiques that focused on its philosophical implications and aesthetic values.

One of Danto's primary concerns with conceptual art was based on its eschewal of aesthetic experience in favor of ideas or concepts. Danto believed that art's beauty and its ability to provide aesthetic experiences were valuable. Conceptual art, by focusing almost exclusively on ideas and often disregarding the aesthetic or formal qualities of the artwork, seemed to him to miss an essential component of what traditionally defined art.

Danto also critiqued the way conceptual art sometimes assumed a didactic or overly intellectual posture, which could be alienating or inaccessible to viewers without specific theoretical backgrounds. This critiqued the inclusivity and communicative capabilities of art, principles he valued highly. Danto appreciated art forms that could engage broader audiences through sensory, emotional, or intellectual impact without necessitating a specialized background to understand the work.

However, it's important to mention that Danto admired the way conceptual art pushed the boundaries of traditional art media and challenged the philosophical foundations of art. It stimulated new debates about the definition and purpose of art, aligning well with Danto's own interest in the philosophy of art. His own theory of art, centered around the concept of the "artworld" and the notion of art as embodying meaning, can even be seen as sympathetic to conceptual approaches which foreground interpretation and context over perceptual qualities.

By critiquing certain aspects of conceptual art, Danto sought a balanced view that maintained an appreciation for the experiential qualities of art alongside its conceptual depth. This dual focus can be seen as an attempt to preserve the richness of art's impact on the individual and community, encompassing both intellectual engagement and sensory appreciation.

Arthur Danto's approach to art significantly extends beyond traditional aesthetics by reconfiguring how we understand the nature and status of art in contemporary society. Traditional aesthetics often focused on beauty, form, and the sensory experiences associated with art. Danto, however, introduced a deeply philosophical discourse to the field, emphasizing the importance of meaning, context, and historicity in understanding artworks.

His seminal essay "The Artworld" (1964) introduced the concept of the artworld itself, a theoretical framework that art must be understood within the context of cultural history, institutions, and theories that define art at a particular time. According to Danto, an artwork's status as art is determined not just by its visible properties or its capacity to deliver aesthetic pleasure, but by the theory and the narratives that the artworld holds about what art can be.

Danto’s notion of the "end of art" further demonstrates his departure from traditional aesthetics. In his book "After the End of Art" (1997), Danto argued that the historical progression of art has led to a point where traditional criteria for judging art forms have dissolved. In the contemporary artworld, any object can potentially be considered art if it is presented as such within the right context, essentially arguing that art now operates in a post-historical period where all styles and movements coexist without a directional narrative.

Furthermore, Danto highlighted the importance of interpretation and philosophy in understanding art. He believed that artworks serve as embodiments of philosophical ideas about the world and used the term “art as philosophy” to suggest that many artworks conceptualize questions and themes similar to those addressed by philosophy.

By shifting the focus from mere aesthetic evaluation to an analysis that includes history, philosophy, and cultural context, Danto extended the concept of art beyond traditional boundaries and opened up new avenues for understanding the role and significance of art in contemporary culture. This holistic view places him as a pivotal figure in the discussion about what art does, why it matters, and how it should be evaluated.

Arthur Danto, a prominent philosopher and art critic, proposed a distinctive and influential theory about the nature and definition of art. According to Danto, what defines a work of art is not its aesthetic qualities but rather its nature as something about which an "artworld" of artists, critics, curators, and other art-related institutions has formed theories. This makes art fundamentally a matter of interpretation and context, rather than purely sensory or formal characteristics.

Danto introduced the concept of the "artworld" in his essay "The Artworld" (1964), where he argued that something is art when it has a subject, engages in some style or genre, and projects some attitude or point of view, very often implicating aesthetic considerations. This understanding was particularly illustrated by his famous example of Andy Warhol’s Brillo Box sculptures. These artworks physically resembled ordinary commercial Brillo boxes, and yet they were accepted as art due to the context and discourse of the artworld that enveloped them.

Danto's theory is often described as an "institutional theory of art," since it emphasizes the roles of cultural and institutional contexts in defining art. According to this view, whether something is considered art depends significantly on the institutions (such as museums, galleries, critical discourse) that recognize it as such.

Through this lens, art is defined not merely by visible markers or traditional mediums but through a complex interplay of intentions, contexts, and receptions, inherent in a cultural framework that accepts and recognizes these objects and practices as "art." This approach allowed for a broad inclusivity, accommodating the wide variety of contemporary art forms and practices that traditional definitions of art would struggle to encompass.

Arthur Danto, a prominent philosopher of art, developed a distinctive framework to distinguish between art and non-art that hinges largely on the concepts of the artworld and the role of interpretation. His theory emerged from a philosophical challenge presented by the works of Andy Warhol, particularly his Brillo Box sculptures, which closely resembled ordinary commercial Brillo boxes. This led Danto to question what set the artwork apart from everyday objects that looked identical.

Danto argued that a work of art is defined by its having a meaning or, more specifically, an "artworld" context—where "artworld" refers to the cultural and historical context in which the art exists. According to Danto, this artworld comprises an atmosphere of artistic theory under which art is created, disseminated, and appreciated. It is a social institution filled with artistic narratives, theories, and histories that give objects within it deeper meaning.

For Danto, an object is art if it is about something, and it achieves this status through interpretations that connect it to wider narrative contexts. This concept is encapsulated in what he termed the "Artworld," which involves an elaborate network of artists, critics, curators, historians, and consumers who together create the environment in which art can be understood and appreciated as such.

Thus, the difference between a mere object and a work of art lies in the intention of the artist and the acceptance of the viewer within this narrative framework of the Artworld. Both the intentions that artists have when creating art and the structure and acceptance of these intentions by the Artworld are crucial. In other words, something becomes art when the Artworld accepts it as an entity that engages with historical, theoretical, or social contexts.

Danto's influential idea is that art is not defined purely by visible criteria or material form but by a complex intersection of narrative, interpretation, and cultural engagement that differentiates artworks from mere objects. This theoretical framework allows for a very inclusive conception of art, recognizing as artistic many forms that might traditionally have been dismissed.

Arthur Danto, a prominent 20th-century philosopher of art, addressed the notion of beauty in art primarily by placing it in the context of his broader theory of art. His seminal idea, the "Artworld" theory, proposed in his famous essay "The Artworld" (1964), suggests that what transforms mere objects into art is the context provided by an artworld—a complex network of artists, museums, critics, and viewers who share an understanding of art.

Danto's views on beauty are particularly influenced by his interest in how art operates beyond mere aesthetic appeal. He argued that historically, beauty was often considered synonymous with art; art was what was beautiful. However, since the 18th century, and especially apparent in the art of the 20th and 21st centuries, beauty has been largely displaced from its position at the core of what art must express or embody.

Danto observed that contemporary art has often rejected the pursuit of beauty, embracing instead what he described as "the art of the unpresentable." Artworks like Marcel Duchamp’s "Fountain" (a urinal declared as a piece of art) illustrate Danto’s point that art can achieve significance through intellectual challenge and conceptual inquiry, rather than through traditional notions of beauty.

For Danto, the focus in contemporary art on challenging the preconceptions of what art can be or should be typically distanced itself from classical aesthetic criteria, including beauty. While he recognized that artworks could of course be beautiful, he insisted that beauty was neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for something to be considered art. Art’s essence, in Danto's view, lies rather in its capacity to comment on art itself and on its historical and cultural contexts—its self-referentiality and its inclusion in critical dialogue.

Thus, while Danto appreciated beauty where it occurred, his philosophy resolutely divorced the value of art from its beauty, focusing instead on concepts, historical understanding, and philosophical depth as the hallmarks of artistic achievement.

Yes, Arthur Danto wrote about the "end of art," a philosophical concept that he famously discussed in his book "After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History," published in 1997. Danto's idea of the end of art does not suggest that art would cease to exist, but rather that art had reached an endpoint in its historical development; a point where the historical narrative that drove the progression and evaluation of art had effectively concluded. He argued that after this point, art became pluralistic with no particular binding narrative or exclusive method, giving rise to a myriad of styles and approaches. This thesis built upon ideas he first explored in a 1984 essay titled "The End of Art," where he examined the impact of such transformations on the understanding and creation of art.

Yes, Arthur Danto is widely recognized as an aesthetician, among his other scholarly roles. He made significant contributions to the field of aesthetics and the philosophy of art. Danto is perhaps best known for his work on the "end of art" thesis, which suggests that the historical progression of art has reached a point where virtually anything can be considered art. This idea has had a profound impact on how art is understood and discussed in contemporary times. His writings explore the relationships between art, history, and philosophy, making him a pivotal figure in aesthetic theory.

Discover and learn about people that are similar to Arthur Danto.