AI Content Detector

Analyze

Analyze text and detect AI-generated patterns with confidence scores and clear explanations.

Detect AI-generated text — with explanations, not just a score

AI content detection for editors, teachers, recruiters, and content reviewers.

Most AI detectors give you a percentage and call it a day. The AI Content Detector returns something far more useful: a verdict, a confidence score, the specific stylistic signals it found (or didn't), and the caveats you need to use the result responsibly. Built for the people whose jobs actually depend on knowing — editors triaging guest posts, teachers reviewing student work, recruiters evaluating writing samples, and platform reviewers fighting AI spam at scale.

How to detect AI-generated content

Five steps from suspicious text to an evidence-based verdict.

  1. Paste the text you want to analyze — a few full paragraphs gives the best signal.
  2. Pick a detail level — Quick for a verdict, Comprehensive for paragraph-by-paragraph analysis.
  3. Add context if useful: expected author, genre, source, or known constraints.
  4. Generate the analysis and read both the supporting and opposing signals.
  5. Use the verdict as one input alongside your own editorial judgment — never as the final word.

What the detector actually examines

Not just vibes — specific stylistic patterns common to AI writing.

Sentence rhythm

Burstiness analysis

Human writing has uneven sentence lengths and rhythm. AI tends toward uniform, predictable cadence.

Vocabulary patterns

Word choice signatures

Overuse of certain hedging words and connectors ("furthermore," "delve into," "in conclusion") is a strong signal.

Structural tells

Templated organization

AI loves predictable structure — intro, three points, conclusion. Detects formulaic essay-shaped writing.

Generic conclusions

Vague summaries

AI often closes with safe, inoffensive generalities instead of specific, opinionated takes.

Factual hedging

Excessive caution

Heavy use of "may," "could," "some experts believe" patterns associated with AI's risk-averse output.

Originality signals

Voice and specificity

Unique anecdotes, specific names, opinionated takes, and lived-experience details push the verdict toward human.

Real-world use cases

Important caveats — read this before you decide anything

AI content detection is probabilistic. Treat it that way.

No AI detector is 100% accurate. Heavily edited AI text can pass as human. Original human writing — especially from non-native English speakers, technical writers, or formal academic authors — can be falsely flagged as AI. Never use a detector verdict alone to accuse a student of cheating, fire an employee, or reject a piece of content. Use it as one signal among many, and always pair it with editorial judgment.

Best practices for responsible AI detection

  1. Analyze longer samples (300+ words) for more reliable signals.
  2. Read the supporting evidence, not just the score — the why matters more than the percentage.
  3. Account for context: technical writing, formal academic style, and ESL writing can be misclassified.
  4. Never use a detection verdict as the sole basis for a high-stakes decision.
  5. When the result is ambiguous, follow up with the writer — most cases resolve in conversation.
  6. Disclose your detection process when the outcome affects someone's grade, job, or publication.

Built for content gatekeepers

Editors & publishers

Submission triage

Quickly screen guest posts and freelance submissions for undisclosed AI generation before assigning a desk editor.

Teachers & professors

Academic integrity

Use detection as one signal alongside in-class writing samples and conversations — never as standalone evidence.

Recruiters & HR

Writing sample review

Validate that writing samples submitted for editorial, marketing, and content roles reflect the candidate's real ability.

Platform moderators

AI spam at scale

Triage low-effort AI-generated reviews, comments, and posts before they overwhelm community spaces.

AI Content Detector FAQ

Is the AI content detector free?

Yes. Detect AI-generated text at no cost on the free plan. Upgrade for longer text limits, faster processing, and more daily analyses.

How accurate is the AI detector?

Accuracy varies with text length, style, and editing. The tool returns a confidence score and the specific signals it found so you can judge the result yourself instead of trusting a single percentage.

Can edited AI text fool the detector?

Often, yes. A human editor who rewrites AI output for voice, rhythm, and specificity can produce content that detectors will (correctly) classify as human. There's no perfect detector.

Will it falsely flag human writing as AI?

It can. Formal academic style, technical writing, and writing from non-native English speakers sometimes triggers false positives. Always read the supporting signals and use judgment.

Can I use this to accuse a student of using ChatGPT?

No — please don't. AI detection is probabilistic, not proof. Use it as one signal alongside in-class writing samples, drafts, and conversation. Never make accusations based on a detector score alone.

What models can it detect?

The detector looks for stylistic patterns common across modern LLMs — including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Llama, and others. It's not tied to one specific model.

How long should the text be?

300+ words gives the most reliable analysis. Shorter samples may not contain enough stylistic signal to produce a confident verdict.

An evidence-based answer to a real question

Better than a percentage. More honest than a verdict.

AI-generated content isn't going away. The question for editors, teachers, recruiters, and platform owners isn't whether AI will be used — it's how to spot it when disclosure matters. The AI Content Detector gives you the evidence to make that call thoughtfully, with the caveats clearly stated. Detect the patterns. Read the signals. Make the call as a human.